Wednesday, 11 April 2012

Weeks 12-14

Week 12 March

19-25 Monday March Devoted to readings and notes towards drafting the APG Report.

Week 13 March

26 Monday March Museum Utopias Conference –Pre-Conference Events.

27 Tuesday March Museum Utopias Conference

28 Wednesday March Museum Utopias Conference and Brown Bag Seminar: Dr Stephanie Pratt.

29 Thursday March APG Report—University Report and Departmental Version

30 Friday March APG Report—University Report and Departmental Version. Sent out request for Research Week Abstracts.

31/01 April Weekend APG Report—University Report and Departmental Version

Week 14 April

02 Monday April Reviewing Application Process for Arts Council Grants.

03 Tuesday April Revising AGP Reports.

04 Wednesday April Research at Nottingham Contemporary—made use of their reading room/library to revisit W.B. Arcades Project, and Baudrillard’s System of Objects, in terms of current research.

05 Thursday April Liverpool Research

06 Friday April Blackpool Research: Grundy Art Gallery, Blank Stir Exhibition.

07/08 April Weekend Returned from Blackpool, finished APG draft (to be sent to Sandra on Monday).

Saturday, 17 March 2012

Weeks 8-11

Week 8

20 Monday February Strategies for Introducing and Embedding a New Museum Ethics in the Museum Sector, Marstine and Dodd. 3-5PM

21 Tuesday Nominated to and accepted to Brown Bag Seminar Coordination for next year.

22 Wednesday Brown Bag Speaker: Chris Collins NHM Title: From Homer to Genocide Sponsors: Dave Unwin, Gudrun Whitehead -also- Museum Studio Reading Group: Seminar Leader: Cintia Velazquez

AND: Student Meeting SSCC.

MS and SSCC were moved from 29 to 22 due to Teatopia fundraiser conflict. I was not in attendance of 'Teatopia' due to previous arrangements for the 29th.

23 Thursday February London British Library Research and ‘Bingo’ Night at the Young Vic.

24 Friday Caught up on personal Journal work.

25/26 Weekend: Review of data for monitor readings. Email. Intensive work on ‘gift exchange’ research paper.

Week 9

27 Monday: Intensive work on ‘gift exchange’ research paper.

28 Tuesday: Intensive work on ‘gift exchange’ research paper.

29 Wednesday: Brown Bag Seminar Speaker: Mike Pickering, National Museums Australia Title: "Voices from the Wilderness: the Canning Stock Route" Sponsors: Janet Marstine, Elee Kirk--Also, today is Leap Day: I journeyed to London to review materials at the library, and then conduct 'field research' at The Lexington.

01 March Thursday: Intensive work on ‘gift exchange’ research paper.

02 Friday: Special Topics Seminar: Jan Ramirez, director of the under-construction 9/11 Museum.

03/04 Weekend: Intensive work on ‘gift exchange’ research paper. Sunday: Dinner Interview with Professor Susan Pearce and Dr. Vivian Golding.

Week 10 March

05 Monday: Raw transcription of last night's interview and drafted edit of the interview write-up for afterword of forthcoming publication.

06 Tuesday: Volunteered to gather abstracts for Research Week presentations. Sent paper on Museum Display as Gift Exchange to Sandra.

07 Wednesday: observed the MA research exercise at the Herbert, 7:45-17:00. Interesting discussion with Marcus Weisen.

08 Thursday: Continued personal research at the Herbert. (Leicester was quite full of people and security due to the Queen, Duke and Duchess of Cambridge visitation)

09 Friday: Revisions to the forthcoming publication/interview working with Viv and Petrina. Scanned took notes etc. for book I needed to return to library, then returned book to library.

10/11 Weekend: I can’t believe the monitoring tasks are almost over. Worked on draft APG report. Caught up on emails and reviewed monitoring data.

Week 11 March

12 Monday: Worked on draft APG report.

13 Tuesday: London Research at Maps and went to talk given by friend at UCL Met with retiring librarian Geoff Armitage at the British Library Maps Room to discuss history of display of the maps collection and possible maps for case study (a very productive conversation). Was referred to head of department Peter Barber for further inquires. 6PM: Institute for Archaeology. Piotr Bienkowski (University of Manchester), speaking engagement with Council for British Research in the Levant (CBRL) for Crystal Bennett Memorial Lecture. Completed scheduling arrangements with Prof. Bienkowski for one of the Brown Bag sessions for 2013.

14 Wednesday MA Association meeting Museums Association Members Meeting 2012 at New Walk: Particularly rewarding discussions with Liz Johnson from the Arts Council (about the application process), with Steve LeMotte Executive Director of EMMS (recommended I have a chat with Graham Black), with Janet Ulph and with Maurice Davies (Ethics Workshop and Debrief Workshop). Brilliant opening and closing by Vanessa Travelyan (President MA) and words by Mark Taylor, Director of the MA.

-Also- in the midst of the MA meeting day I managed to attend a bit of Speaker: Dr. Jennifer Morgan, University of Manchester PhD Title: 'Change and Everyday Practice at the Museum: An Ethnographic Study' Richard Sandell, Mona Al Ali

End of the day: Museum Studio: Helen Wilkinson Presenting.

*NOTE: I was supposed to meet for a supervision with Sandra today but she is quite ill—has been since Monday. We will need to reschedule.

15 Thursday March Deinstallation support for RCP Exhibition and ‘finding brackets’ for display cases in anticipation of MA exhibitions.

Sandra has rescheduled our next supervision for 19 April, 11AM.

16 Friday: Caught up on reading, made interview appointments for article research and object case study research at British Library with Peter Barber head of Maps at the British Library: for 12 April 2PM.

17/18 weekend: Sent E-cards for Mothering Sunday.

Sunday, 19 February 2012

Week Seven Semester II

Monday 13 February: Supervision with Professor Dudley. Library research (particularly verifying Goody sources). Monitor readings administration.

The description for the curatorial sessions I attended last week:

Historical Manuscripts

Arnold Hunt, Curator of Modern Historical Manuscripts: This session provides an overview of the historical manuscript collections of the British Library. An introduction to the electronic and printed finding aids, and on using the manuscripts reading room, will be followed by a discussion of how these sources can be used for a diverse range of historical research, with examples from the collections, and particular emphasis upon manuscript maps.

Newspaper Collections: printed and online resources

Ed King, Head of Newspaper Collections: The talk and workshop will look at the background to the Library's enormous collection of newspapers. The introduction will cover the formation of the collection; how the Library has now 4 million pages online, available free in our reading rooms and in UK HE institutions, and also available on a pay-per-view basis; and what we plan to do in the future regarding more digitisation of newspapers. The range of UK newspapers now available online covers the period 1700-1900, and the titles digitised provide a huge research resource. The session will explain how the selection of C19 newspaper titles for online access has been carried out so far. It will include live interaction with the files, with questions and answers.

Tuesday 14 February: Monitor readings--we are trying out external as well as internal readings. Current theory is that the documents are drawing the moisture from the atmosphere. Valentine’s Day. Returned to modest social media exchanges.

Wednesday 15 February: Social media updates. Worked on revisions to recent paper. Journal updates. Alex Woodall at Museum Studio Seminar, article for discussion: Interpretation and the Hermeneutic Turn by Cheryl Meszaros. Our department is losing its staff to some sort of professional training ‘intervention’. They will be gone five hours a day for the next three months.

Thursday 16 February: Was awakened early by different set of neighbours. (One set out, new set in?) Since I was up anyway, walked up to the campus library to return a late book and check out additional materials.

Friday 17 February: Disruptive Differences Conference/Symposium all day. Dr. Amy Jane Barnes will be added to department staff during the three months of 'Office Intervention' which commence on Monday 20 February.

Weekend: My updates are a bit threadbare this week! Especially given how full of discussion that this past week has been. I am afraid been doing a bit too much ‘social media’ recently, not enough actual work! I will try to do a better reflection upon this past week, next week.

Week Six Semester II

Monday 6 February Have turned in my paper in anticipation of Supervision (moved to next week). Email with Piotr and other professional correspondence. Updated research and training journal.

Tuesday 7 February GSTD Generic Skills Training Day

Wednesday 8 February: Online research of catalogue at British Library (rings, marriage and engagement customs, representation of courtship in ballads and art). Evening Film Course.

Thursday 9 February: Reviewed notes from Goody, Goode and Habakkuk again. I need to find more current work on the subject. Also not much use from the ballads-based documentation (line of inquiry) which is fine. It is at this stage tangential. Looked through Sahaptin dictionary to double-check on some of the meanings for a gift that my mother wishes for me to present to my supervisor and went to dinner in the evening with colleagues. Pleasant conversation of course but particularly enjoyed discussion of relationship between perception of physical experience and reality of physical experience as relative estimations that we are trained to interpret as, for example, the room becoming warmer and brighter RELATIVE to having been more or less so the moment before. Do we have with certainty a socialised standard of perception of environment or is it all much more idiosyncratic and predicated upon an immediate precedent of experience? Do we correlate with our most recent experience of a particular phenomena?

Thus for example, compare the warmth of the room with what we felt two minutes before and (again for example) the quality of a chocolate we are eating with the last instance of consuming chocolate, that we most recently had? This is a strange thing--this last--because I feel fairly certain that I do have certain ‘ideals’. I think (for better or worse ) I probably do have the ‘perfect chocolate’ experience somewhere in my mind . . . but not necessarily ‘the most perfectly temperate room’ experience.

And it may all be quite personal. There may be some people that don’t have such ‘ideals’ and for them, every chocolate is the ‘most perfect’ or perhaps they simply take that particular chocolate at the moment they are consuming it, for what it is. Perhaps some people take each 'instance of chocolate' for itself; not for how much more or less perfect than any other 'instance of chocolate' they have experienced. (I strongly suspect though, that most of us have 'standards'.)

I know this may not sound terribly ‘related’ to my research--but it is. If the essence of the gift exchange is based upon expectation, are there predicates to expectation that modify perception of the display experience? Are ‘experienced’ museumgoers leveling an idiosyncratically-informed critique about the displays upon the situation, a critique that modifies their personal experience of the object in display? Do visitors have expectations for objects or classes of objects that alters receptivity to the 'ideal' museum experience?

Friday 10 February: Training Day at British Library--Curatorial Sessions Arnold Hunt, Curator of Modern Historical Manuscripts and with Ed King, Head of Newspaper Collections. In the evening attended The Royal Library: Old and New : “The magnificent items on display in the exhibition Royal Manuscripts: the Genius of Illumination have largely come from the Old Royal library, collected by generations of kings and presented to the nation in 1757 by George II. A subsequent donation by George IV of over 65,000 printed books, known as the King’s Library, is also housed at the British Library, where it forms an impressive sight displayed en masse at the heart of the building. In the meantime, the Royal Library, primarily kept at Windsor Castle, is a rich and intriguing collection boasting many remarkable bindings and fascinating personal links to successive monarchs. The stories of these libraries are explored by Kathleen Doyle and John Goldfinch of the British Library, and Jane Roberts, the Royal Librarian.”

While I enjoyed this very much I think that the previous session I attended was better received by the audience. Here is its official description: “In the later Middle Ages, sacred, solemn texts were often accompanied by images seemingly intended to distract, to amuse and perhaps even to shock their readers. Playful and sometimes perverse, such images offer powerful insights into the nature of devotion in the period. Drawing on the monkeys and monsters depicted in the margins of the British Library's Royal manuscripts, this lecture considers what these images tell us about the people who made and owned these books. Alixe Bovey is familiar as the presenter of the BBC television series In Search of Medieval Britain (2008). She is a lecturer in Medieval History at the University of Kent and former curator in the Department of Manuscripts at the British Library. Her research has been chiefly concerned with pictorial narratives and their cultural and literary context. She has also written on medieval monsters.”

The notion of 'margins as commentary' and the idea that the medieval mind was constantly consciously contending with what the senses experiences vs. what one was 'allowed' to experience, was fascinating . . . because they seemed to acknowledge that it was a losing battle. It suggests that for society to 'get on' without impossible bloodshed, there was some understanding that natural urgencies needed to be managed, not simply suppressed. Of course some of the management was to burn people at the stake . . . but at least there was a healthy recognition that human nature is . . . complex (in a very simple sort of way).

The Victorians seem to be about 'suppression' of 'human nature' or of what I've called 'natural urgencies'. I personally believe that discipline and ignorance will only take a society so far however before resultant is an entire generation of psychopaths and a backlash of self-indulgent fecklessness in the guise of 'freedom'.

The upshot for my work is that I may need to spend more time on periodicity than previously intended.

Weekend: Monitor Administration.

Monday, 6 February 2012

Semester II Weeks 1-5.


Introduction to the first five weeks of Semester II 2011-2012, University of Leicester:

During the break I primarily spent time with my mum, who was visiting from the USA. It was a very difficult Christmas for us; the first without my father. Additionally, we were originally going to go spend the holidays with family friends in Munich (friends my father grew up with) but my visa got held up and we couldn’t go—it was for some reason sent to the Student Welfare instead of my home and I was not allowed access to retrieve it until January. It was discouraging; our friends in Germany had made wonderful food and gifts for us. There were so many plans! It would have been very healing for all of us to be able to share each other’s company in our grief, to be with people that also knew and miss my father, to tell stories about our memories of him, of Ina’s parents, Post-WWII Munich . . . It makes me angry to think that my visa was simply sitting on someone’s desk under a stack of neglected incoming post ‘to be sorted’. It would have been much the better for all concerned, for events to have unfolded differently. (I am still furious and will never forgive ‘Providence’ for preventing the Christmas visit to Germany.)

Here is the synopsis for the past few weeks . . .


Semester II Week 1 and 2:


03-07 January 2012: Visited V&A, Natural History Museum and Science Museum in London, took monitor readings, reviewed Dr. Bruce Hood’s work and its possible implications for objects and agency discussion. Next paper on subject of museum display as gift exchange due 8 February.

8-15 January: Library Research Days and informed that RCP Exhibit Extended & Monitor Read-ings Extended through March. Called UofM and apparently my MA document is ‘lost in the mail’. I have had to order a replacement at my own expense. Note: on 10 January I finally acquired my residence card/visa, passport, application materials etc. For some reason these materials were re-turned to the Student Welfare office rather than my residential address. (Frustrating!)

Semester II Week Three

Monday 16 January: Readings and revisions. Expressly working on notes from ‘On Collecting’ and drawing diagrams.
Tuesday 17 January: Readings and revisions. More notes from ‘On Collecting’ and drawing dia-grams. Visited with Janet Berry at one of her “Museum Environments: Relative Humidity and Temperature” sessions.
Wednesday 18 January, Speaker: Beryl Graham, Professor of New Media Art Research, University of Sunderland Title: ‘Curating after New Media Art: Museums and Audiences’
Sandra Dudley, Catharina Hendrick. Missed this due to confusion about scheduling and where it was actually to be held (the room changed three times).

Thursday 19 January 2012: SSCC Meeting in the Collections Room. Missed the session—apologies sent.

Friday 20 January 2012: Readings and revisions.

Weekend: A singularly unproductive weekend.


Semester II Week Four

Monday 23 January 2012: Lunar New Year: Year of the Dragon. My father died last year on 3 February, last year, the Lunar New Year (Year of the Rabbit). My thoughts are preoccupied.

Tuesday 24 January 2012: Readings and revisions. Read up on the Nagoya Protocol in anticipa-tion of Thursday’s session at NHM.

Wednesday 25 January:
Brown Bag Speaker: Dr Marilena Alivizatou, UCL London
Title: ‘Intangible Heritage’ Suzanne MacLeod, Laura Diaz Ramos
Admirable work (nothing I was unaware of however). Seminar inadvertently raised old personal frustration about inadequacy of language use and question: what, precisely, is ‘intangible’ about the heritage being practiced and conserved? Suddenly occurs that there may be common priorities be-tween Nagoya and IH of UNESCO.

Thursday 26 January:
London Natural History Museum Seminar, C. Lyal Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing (ABS) and British Library research day.This was a very informative session. The main interests from my perspective were that the legalities involved currently, require much more friendly-if-formal, building of relationships and an international infrastructure for researchers in collection, in the field. Had lovely conversation with Chris Lyal afterwards about the overlap between Nagoya and UNESCO priorities regards ‘Traditional Knowledge’.

Friday 27 January 2012: Nottingham: Nottingham Contemporary--the Demand Opening.
A brilliant opening, well-attended. Under-whelmed by Demand. ‘The Wall’ DJ duo were a bit too loud volume wise, to be the ‘chill’ ambient music they were billed to be. Additionally, they were, at the start using signal waveforms designed to modify the audiences brainwaves patterns . . . to create a kind of experiential ‘tabla rasa’ in audience consciousness, before applying their own, inoculation of music/image patterning (it was a bit heavy handed, imho; please see soapbox below). The ‘arts community’ of Nottingham appeared to have turned out ‘in force’ and as mental lapse would have it, I forgot my camera! Memory image that remains in my mind: mother and 2 or 3 year-old child looking down into the ‘black box’ concert lecture theatre, child in wonder at the scene below, mother in wonder at the child.

Authorial note/soapbox about ‘The Walls’:
I liked them very much, but I don’t approve of using light, image and sound to profoundly manipu-late/hypnotise unwary people, and yes, such ‘hypnosis’/entrainment CAN be done—it pretty much happens quite naturally—and yes, more and more artists are ‘experimenting’ with sonorous ‘mood control’ that they don’t really understand, to the potential detriment of the audience. Using light, image and sound to mess about with the brainwave patterns of the audience, when you DO NOT know what you are doing (are perhaps just ‘curious to see what will happen’) is a little like the difference between giving the uninitiated a brandied chocolate and giving them a shot of heroine, while not actually knowing for certain which substance you are administering to said uninitiated! It is a bit irresponsible. Such artistic practice is a particularly unforgivable application of a/v spectacle, when some of the ‘uninitiated’ are children! And there WERE children present! As for myself, fortunately, I had my earplugs with me, tied myself to my sturdy sense-of-self mast and transited the dangerous aesthetic waters relatively unscathed. Again, overall it was a brilliant opening. I con-tinue to be very impressed with Nottingham Contemporary and their active engagement of the community.

Weekend: Monitor readings data administration and lots of paperwork. Reviewed film course notes (as a creative outlet, I have been attending a film criticism course on Tuesdays). Though very basic, the course is providing a helpful refresher on visual narrative structure and conventions.

Semester II Week Five

Monday 30 January 2012: Readings and research (British Library Catalogue)

Tuesday 31 January 2012: Readings and research (British Library Catalogue)

Wednesday 1 February 2012:
Missed the Brown Bag Session—I had thought this session cancelled and so made other plans for a research day in London. Apparently the session was not cancelled. Apologies!

What I did instead . . .

I completed my Reader Registration Process at the British Library, researched renaissance ballads regarding objects and ceremony (or tried to) and visited the Transport Museum—including their film event ‘Future Cities’. Interesting, not perhaps what the audience was expecting. Well attended, but audience did not seem to understand that there was a discussion with the artists available after the viewing. Still, admirable start to the new community dialogue direction the Museum appears interested in.

Thursday 2 February 2012: Worked on paper. Updated CV. Discovered that I need to transfer my Mobile Me website to . . . ‘someplace else’. All very bothersome. I booked for an open study day at the British Library for 10 February. I worked on my current paper; I’m afraid that at the rate things are going, it will not be very polished, nor well-cited.

Friday 3 February 2012: London British Library Research Day, followed by evening lecture ‘Sub-lime Words, Ridiculous Images; Visual Humour in the Royal Manuscript Collection’ with Alixe Bovey. Self-explanatory, but focussed again on relationship between objects and agency as well as 19th and 20th century engagement traditions and marriage-as-contract. Dr. Bovey’s lecture was de-lightful! Do think it difficult however for us to separate the reality of the Middle Ages from the Post-Victorian ‘cultural lenses/filters’ that even today, influence popular notions about the past. Is it possible that the people of the Middle Ages were actually more ‘self-aware’ of their own ‘humanity’ than we are today (in these supposedly ‘enlightened’ times)? I also visited the Foundling Museum. It was not at all what I imagined, based upon the website. I also think that more than this, I am ill-prepared to say for now.

3 February overnight to 4 February marks the one-year anniversary of my father’s death. All day my thoughts have been with him and how he would have enjoyed seeing London, how he would have marvelled at the wonderful books I have access to, the lectures I attend, the places I have the opportunity to go to, the trains I travel on and architectural beauty all around me. He would have loved the architecture of St. Pancras Station and the Natural History Museum. In all of his life, he never lost his sense of ‘wonderment’ nor ceased to take pleasure in the world. I miss him, his thoughts, his company. He gave the very best hugs in the known universe. (Actually, I suspect them to be the best hugs in the unknown universe as well but that leads to a certain difficulty—the minute that I prove the fact, the unknown becomes the known, yes?)

They say it will snow this weekend but really, how often are those ‘weather-folk’ right? I mean, it is quite cold but the sky is clear and the sun is shining!

Weekend: It snowed on Saturday. :) Papa would have liked that. I sent a draft copy of my current paper to Sandra on Sunday. Other than that, simply worked on monitor admin and made appoint-ments for next week. I feel as though I have been asleep since the end of November (Thanksgiving, USA 2011) and am slowly rousting very unsteadily from my slumbers.

Saturday, 17 December 2011

Week Ten

Friday 09 December 2011: Readings in Pearce, Latour and Mauss. Admittedly concentration is not all it could be. In effort to regain focus am adopting a ‘new system’ for organisation of notes. Took a moment to respond to a friend’s request for help/advice on writing a museums-related project proposal--happy to do it but worried that I may have hindered more than helped. I woke up to find that my Twitter layout is ‘new’ and was at first worried that it was still hacked but have since discovered that admin seems to be automatically placing some of the accounts on the new profile style.

Thursday 08 December 2011: Polishing and publication of write-up to ‘The Attic’ of journal report for Dr. Albeti’s seminar visit. My Twitter and Facebook accounts seem to have been secured.

Wednesday 07 December 2011: Was informed today of paternal grandmother’s death at 4AM this morning. Attended Brown Bag Seminar with Dr. Sam Alberti on the subject of medical museums. Drafted the report for 'The Attic' about the seminar and sent the draft to certify some of the facts with Dr. Alberti. In addition to all other complications, online Twitter account appears to have been hacked; Twitter administration is ‘sorting’ the situation.

Tuesday 06 December 2011: Found possible angle/avenue for support of thesis of ‘gift’ as inherent to certain types of objects.

Monday 05 December 2011: Readings in Pearce, Latour and Mauss. Descriptive diagramming of possible convergence of spatial contingency and cultural interpretation towards the agency of objects (or again, perceived agency of objects . . . though am attempting to show that there is inherent agency within some objects; mono-mythic, objects-of-agency condition blended with popular media, resulting in the creation of a sort of ‘meta museum object’). Am allowing this problem ‘to rest’ while I return to the main subject of display dynamics as gift exchange.

Weekend: Research at home--review of online resources. Scheduling for monitor readings. On Saturday a number of us from research went on a ‘Museum Crawl’ hosted by Dr. Amy Barnes. After an invigorating day, we adjourned to a lovely dinner at Shivalli’s to ‘debrief’. This was absolutely essential to the well-being of the more sensitive among the PhD candidates after having discovered the infamous ‘Tiger Snuffbox’.

Sunday, 11 December 2011

Week Nine

Friday 02 December 2011: Readings in Pearce, Latour and Mauss.

Thursday 01 December 2011: Library research study day; primarily Pearce, Latour and Mauss.

Wednesday 30 November 2011: Library research and Brown Bag Seminar with Kate Hill about ‘York Castle Museum’.

Tuesday 29 November 2011: Supervision meeting with Sandra. Went up to main campus to request appropriate letters of student exemption for council tax forms. Sandra sent out an inquiry to the general PhD community regarding:

Media coverage for Arts and Humanities Research Council funding. The precise criteria was along the lines of did anyone have a ready example of:

1. Media (presume news coverage, video, social media . . . blogs too?) coverage

of

2. Student projects: funded by AHRC but NOT with collaborative doctoral award

and with

3. NO external partner.

I personally was not able to come up with much and I don't think it was a matter of not looking in the 'right' places. I believe this criteria describes a currently unusual circumstance.

There are case studies listed at the AHRC for small grants that appear to meet the specified criteria in some cases. Most of the cases I found that seem to meet the criteria have not been reported in mainstream media or documented in video. Additionally, many of the reports I have found reported by the AHRC itself or are published by the researcher in the form of a personal blog.

In cases where there is a collaborator such as the BBC, a commercial, media-savvy collaborator or major institution, I observe that there some news reports (Royal Manuscripts research for example). Does this suggest that we in research are not the best at marketing or publicity? I'm also wondering if the economic climate means that collaboration is more the norm, as well as 'trusting' university-based _project groups_ that have professorial leadership? I was sorry not to have be able to contribute to Tallack's research.

I was also informed just before midnight of a bereavement: my godmother Nancy Hall.

Monday 28 November 2011: Preparation for supervision and ‘reconnoitering’ of general objectives. Reviewed current resources and updated the comprehensive annotated bibliography. There are still quite a few resources that I haven’t properly explicated. I need to set more focussed time aside to distill and properly cite quotes (and arguments) for future use.

Weekend: Research at home--review of online resources. Scheduling for monitor readings.